美国最高法院驳回了苹果公司暂停 Epic Games 诉讼的请求，允许案件发回地区法院审理。此决定意味着法院现在可以计算苹果公司对应用商店外购买可收取的佣金。此前，第九巡回上诉法院已撤销了对该裁决的暂停，为苹果公司寻求最高法院审查期间的此项计算铺平了道路。 AI
影响 这项裁决可能会影响应用商店佣金的确定方式，从而影响科技公司的收入模式。
排序理由 最高法院就一家大型科技公司的法律纠纷做出裁决是一件重大事件。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 4 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Supreme Court rejects Apple’s stay request, Epic Games case to head back to District Court The US Supreme Court rejected Apple’s request today that would have temporarily paused the Epic Games case from returning to the District Court for proceedings that are set to calculate how…
Apple files for Supreme Court stay in Epic case over off-App Store commission dispute [U] Update, 9:18 p.m. ET: Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has commented on Apple’s filing to the Supreme Court. Details below. Apple has filed an application with the Supreme Court asking it to stay …
Apple Asks Supreme Court to Pause Epic Games Case Ahead of App Store Fee Ruling Apple today filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court, asking for a stay on App Store fee calculations while it waits to hear whether the Supreme Court will weigh in on the latest developm…
Court reverses pause on Epic Games ruling ahead of Apple’s Supreme Court bid Epic Games just convinced the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reverse a prior decision that had paused the case from being sent back to the district court while Apple sought Supreme Court re…