PulseAugur
实时 07:50:34
Nederlands(NL) Claude's responses are just word vomit

用户批评 Claude 的回复比 GPT 冗长

一位同时付费使用 ClaudeGPT 模型的用户发现,即使使用 Opus 4.8Opus 5Fable 5.1 等高级模型,Claude 的回复也过于冗长,缺乏简洁性。尽管尝试使用 ELI5 等技巧并调整记忆,用户仍未从 Claude 获得一致的简洁输出。相比之下,用户称赞 GPT 即使对于复杂的提示也能提供直接且格式良好的回复,且几乎没有废话。 AI

影响 强调用户对简洁 AI 输出的偏好,可能影响模型开发。

排序理由 用户观点文章,比较两个 AI 模型。

在 r/ClaudeAI 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

用户批评 Claude 的回复比 GPT 冗长

本文如何被排名

Signal score
0 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Commentary
用户观点文章,比较两个 AI 模型。
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
opinion
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
2 days old
Coverage has settled into its steady-state source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准

报道来源 [1]

  1. r/ClaudeAI TIER_2 Nederlands(NL) · /u/Far_Designer2131 ·

    Claude 的回应简直是胡言乱语

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So I pay for both claude and GPT $200/mo plans. So I get my fair use out of both to say the least. What I cannot figure out is how to get Claude to CONSISTENTLY respond in a manner that is concise and not wordy. I mostly use Opus 4.8, Opus 5, Fab…