一位用户对Anthropic的沟通和产品表现表示不满，认为其限制武断且模型质量不稳定。用户特别批评“opus 5”表现糟糕，并质疑该公司在这些问题上的沉默，尤其考虑到其服务的成本。 AI
影响 用户反馈突显了模型一致性和定价方面可能存在的问题，影响了客户的看法。
排序理由 用户对公司产品和沟通的评论文章。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Anthropic因沟通和模型表现面临用户批评
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 2 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户对公司产品和沟通的评论文章。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
Anthropic 的员工在哪里？他们为什么这么安静？什么都没有……真是他妈的懦夫。你们的限制是狗屁，你们的模型现在很普通，opus 5 简直是个笑话，太糟糕了。然而你们却乐意向我每个 max 账户收取 200 美元。
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Its just so frustrating. There is so much wrong atm. The limits are a joke. the models are becoming below average. They are so inconstant constantly wavering between brilliant and brain dead, opus 5 is a mess and there is just radio silence. </p>…