NeurIPS 2026 概念与可行性轨道正因其评审流程和对既定政策的遵守情况而受到审查。作者们反映，评审员并未遵循该轨道的指导方针，该方针允许那些可能未在单篇论文中完全验证的想法。尽管对原创性给予了赞扬，但据报道，投稿因实验范围而受到惩罚，且在反驳后评审员的互动有限。 AI
影响 对新颖AI研究概念的评估和接受可能产生影响。
排序理由 讨论一个主要AI研究会议中的特定轨道。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I could not find any discussion threads for the C&F track. Have people actually submitted to this track? If so, what are your reviews and scores looking like, along with post rebuttal engagement? In our case, they received reviews not in line…