有人呼吁 NeurIPS 2026 会议的评审员，如果论文的答辩成功解决了他们的疑虑，请调整评分。作者认为，评审员不应仅仅因为个人对论文或其方法的偏好而维持较低的评分，并强调科学研究允许个人追求他们认为有意义的观点，即使这些观点并非对所有人都显而易见。 AI
影响 这篇关于学术评审过程的评论可能会影响人工智能研究的评估和发表方式。
排序理由 该条目是一篇评论文章，讨论了会议的评审实践。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
NeurIPS 2026 评审员被敦促在疑虑得到解决后调整评分
报道来源 [1]
-
NeurIPS 2026: If the rebuttal addresses your concern, please raise your score [D]
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Potentially a hot take? I am not sure why our community is plagued with reviewers who, after acknowledging that their concerns were addressed by a rebuttal, decide to maintain their score because they don't vibe with the paper. So here is my plea…