神经信息处理系统会议 (NeurIPS) 正在经历技术问题，影响了审稿流程。在一次事件中，审稿人无法看到作者提交的答辩，导致缺乏参与。这引发了关于鼓励审稿人参与的策略以及对不参与的潜在处罚的讨论，并有人建议 NeurIPS 可能会处罚那些不参与提交论文的审稿人。 AI
影响 可能导致人工智能研究同行评审流程延迟和质量下降。
排序理由 讨论主要学术会议同行评审流程中的问题。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
NeurIPS 面临技术问题影响论文审稿流程 · 跟踪 2 个来源
报道来源 [2]
-
NeurIPS 评审者未参与
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So I know this is an ongoing issue at ML conferences, reviewers just tend to ghost. Do people have any strategies or recommendations on how to nudge them to engage with the rebuttals? Is it recommended to post a comment saying something like hey …
-
Neurips 论文驳斥对审稿人不可见 [D]
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, </p> <p>The author-reviewer discussion period has started, but it looks like the rebuttals are still only visible to program chairs and authors only - so reviewers can't see them ?? I also can't see the rebuttals of papers I reviewed…