一位用户报告称，Anthropic 的 Opus 5.5 模型花费了超过 24 小时来完成一项代码重构任务。用户指出，模型已设置为最大推理能力，并质疑较低的设置是否足够。在尝试简化一个庞大且过度设计的代码库时，观察到了这种延长的处理时间。 AI
影响 凸显了当前大型语言模型在处理复杂、耗时任务时的潜在局限性。
排序理由 用户关于模型性能的报告，并非官方发布或基准测试。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Anthropic 的 Opus 5.5 在冗长的代码重构任务中遇到困难
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 3 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户关于模型性能的报告，并非官方发布或基准测试。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, infra
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
Opus 5.5 运行超过 24 小时以完成重构任务
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I used opus 5.5 (max) and gpt 6.1 Sol (max) to write code for a problem for over a month. I made progress in solving the problem, but realised that the code base is super bloated, and looks over engineered. </p> <p>Then yesterday i asked opus 5.5…