Academics are observing a rise in AI-generated submissions that lack sufficient human oversight, leading to issues like fabricated references and masked weak arguments. While acknowledging the potential for "AI slop," the authors argue that AI can be a valuable tool when used for critical engagement, revision, and dialogue. They propose that scholarship should be judged on its ideas and evidence, and scholars on their thinking, necessitating transparent disclosure of AI assistance and policies that differentiate various forms of AI use in academic work. AI
影响 Calls for transparent disclosure and nuanced policies on AI use in academia, impacting how scholarly work is evaluated and produced.
排序理由 The cluster discusses opinions and potential policy changes regarding AI use in academic writing, based on observations from journal editors.
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
