一位AI用户担心，AI工具，特别是用于编码的工具，会放大那些可能不理解技术或产生错误代码的个人的产出。该用户认为，AI应该由能够正确注明来源的专家使用，而当前的AI模型则建立在被窃取的智慧之上。他们还担心AI开发的利润集中和环境影响。 AI
影响 引发了对AI放大低质量代码以及来源归属和利润分配的伦理影响的担忧。
排序理由 用户对AI对代码质量和归属影响的观点文章。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 5 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
But unfortunately, there are many people who don't care much for the quality of their work and often produce very buggy code. I'd rather these people just stayed away from AI. The AI will amplify the volume of their work and it will likely have similarly high bug rates to the bug…
This does mean that if they don't actually understand the code the AI has suggested, that they immediately need to take what will amount to a lot of time to understand it. That will lead to them becoming the type of expert that I maybe don't mind seeing using AI. See above. # AI …
Maybe it's like a megaphone. I'm happy to have a poet with a megaphone, or a church leader, or a protest leader railing against ICE. An expert. Or even a novice. But someone who cares to become an expert. But I really don't want some random kid with a megaphone. Not in my vicinit…
But these machines do not give credit to their sources. I routinely give credit to stack-overflow sources in my code comments. I do not credit AI. I can't... it's all stolen wisdom from the giants who came before us. And the profits are all going to the landowners, not the worker…
Random AI thought.: A thread. Who would like a full blog post? # AI # software 1/n