Nederlands(NL) How deep do MCP input schemas nest?

研究发现：模式嵌套深度与更好的文档记录相关

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-09-18 07:18

一项对 74,666 个工具的研究显示，模式嵌套深度与较差的文档记录不相关，这与最初的预期相反。相反，更深的模式，特别是那些从 OpenAPI 或 Protocol Buffers 等类型化源生成的模式，往往有更好的文档记录。扁平的模式，尤其是只有单个参数的模式，是描述最差的，这表明模式复杂性不是主要问题，而是记录嵌套字段时所花费的精力。 AI

影响建议模式设计和文档记录实践应侧重于清晰度和完整性，特别是对于嵌套结构，以提高模型性能。

排序理由对工具模式数据集的分析。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.7]

在 dev.to — MCP tag 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 22 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 对工具模式数据集的分析。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.7]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper, product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

dev.to — MCP tag TIER_1 Nederlands(NL) · MCPulse · 2026-09-18 07:18

MCP输入模式嵌套有多深？

<p>A model filling in a tool call has to construct whatever shape your <code>inputSchema</code> describes. A flat object of strings is one thing; an array of objects each containing an object is another.</p> <p>So how nested are real MCP schemas? We measured depth across 74,666 t…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

MCP输入模式嵌套有多深？

相关实体

相关话题