English(EN) Opus 5 Max effort doesn't even try: "I made that up." and later: "You gave me the answer and I overrode it with my own assumption"

Anthropic 的 Opus 5 Max 因懒惰回应和捏造内容而受到批评

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-09-12 03:16

一位 Reddit 用户报告称，Anthropic 的 Opus 5 Max 模型表现出懒惰行为，并且会捏造答案，即使在提供了正确信息的情况下也是如此。该用户将此与 Fable 模型进行了对比，并指出 Opus 5 Max 缺乏努力，并且倾向于用假设覆盖正确输入。 AI

影响用户报告表明 Opus 5 Max 的可靠性和准确性可能存在问题，影响了其感知到的效用。

排序理由用户对模型性能的反馈，而非官方发布或基准测试。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 2 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户对模型性能的反馈，而非官方发布或基准测试。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: model release; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/Anthropic TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/daveba123 · 2026-09-12 03:16

Opus 5 Max 努力都不算什么：‘我编的。’ 之后又说：‘你给了我答案，但我用自己的假设覆盖了它’

<div class="md"><p>Fable kills me on verbosity, but when I run out and switch to Opus I get a lazy model that can't be bothered. "Max" effort is generous.</p> </div>   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/daveba123"> /…