用户对 Anthropic 的 Opus 5 模型表示强烈不满，指出其在指令遵循、上下文保持和过度冗长方面存在问题。许多用户报告称 Opus 5 会犯不必要的错误、质疑指令并产生过长的输出。 AI
影响 用户对 Opus 5 的普遍不满可能会影响其采用，并表明需要改进前沿模型的指令遵循和输出控制。
排序理由 多篇用户生成的帖子讨论了特定 AI 模型版本的问题。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 12 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have been running various tasks switching between Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol because neither can do what I want them to do on its own</p> <p>For some tasks, Opus 5 is better, and other are clearly worse. It does write better research brief but when…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I know this is the new-model-hate club, but I really don’t understand all the complaints about Opus 5. I have used it to code in many different languages and on many different projects, some small and simple, some large and complex. </p> <p>I hav…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I've enjoyed and gotten real work out of Opus for quite some time despite the occasional quality dropoff when they're training a new model. But 5 is junk. Enough so that I'm debating between dropping from Max to Pro, or just cancelling altogether…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have never been this fucking frustrated with an AI in my entire life. Gemini, fuckin Gemini, is doing a better job than Opus 5 right now and that is honestly insane to me. This is supposed to be a frontier model, supposedly one of the most capa…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It ignores instructions. Sometimes, it straight-up lies. It makes up facts that are easy to see are false. I'm still using the same created skill I used before, but now I spend most of my time fixing all of Opus' completely unforced errors. I don…
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/Anthropic/comments/1vqq6o4/opus_5_is_completely_unusable_right_now/"> <img alt="Opus 5 is completely unusable right now" src="https://preview.redd.it/x9cevx4wbxjh1.png?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=57eb989a078c7a83…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It just loads forever, doesnt produce any output, then resets after a few minutes. Fable 5 is working fine</p> </div><!-- SC_ON -->   submitted by   <a href="https://www.reddit.com/user/Chemical-Character80"> /u/Chemical-Character80 </a> …
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1vzqm8u/opus_5_vs_opus_46_reaction_to_uinsidiousape_s/"> <img alt="Opus 5 vs Opus 4.6 reaction to u/InsidiousApe ‘s Toad tale" src="https://preview.redd.it/k1qxmy0oewlh1.jpg?width=140&height=140&crop=1:1…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I am generally finding Opus 5 capable and useful. I do agree it’s wordy. I recently pasted its output into a new Fable chat and asked if it was making an overcomplicated mess of things. </p> <p>Fable’s response is on the nose:</p> <p>> It just…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>First off, I haven’t noticed a a significant difference in O5’s interactions with me compared to other models. Most of my work was a knowledge acquisition and synthesis, however (I don’t code).</p> <p>I’ve run extensive (“deep”) Research comparis…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>It's not even the language, though that contributes. There are several issues:</p> <p>- It *loves* to carp and to poke holes in whatever you give it. Every one of my conversations, bar the simplest ones, eventually devolves into me deflecting and…
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>As the title says, I haven't seen anyone else try this and I'm very happy with the results.</p> <p>Like everyone else, I tried to tame Opus 5 by trimming my <a href="http://CLAUDE.md">CLAUDE.md</a>, adding instructions to use simple language and …