Ethan Mollick 认为，像 ChatGPT 和 Claude 这样的当前 AI 工具未能充分指导非程序员，因为它们没有解释其决策过程。他提倡使用更像产品经理的 AI 界面，详细说明选择和测试。Mollick 还强调了 1985 年互动故事游戏“A Mind Forever Voyaging”的持久价值，并指出该游戏现已开源，并由 Codex 进行了新界面。 AI
影响 AI 界面可以通过为非技术用户采用更透明、更像产品管理的解释来改进。
排序理由 该集群由 Ethan Mollick 关于 AI 界面和经典游戏的观点文章组成。
在 Bluesky Jetstream — AI desk 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
A failure of ChatGPT Work & Claude Cowork is they assume that non-coders couldn't understand how to think about problems like a coder, so they hide all that stuff. They should instead explain choices like a good PM would (what should be delegated? what should be generalized? wha…
Considered one of the best text adventure games (it is more interactive story, with few puzzles), 1985's A Mind Forever Voyaging is still worth a try. Since it is now open source, I had Codex whip up an interface to play the original or in an easy GUI for newbies: mind-forever-v…