r/MachineLearning 子版块上的一个讨论帖正在追踪提交给 Neurips 2026 会议的理论论文的初步审稿分数。用户正在分享他们的论文分数和信心水平，以识别审稿过程中潜在的模式或趋势。该帖子表明，与其它学科相比，理论论文可能获得更保守的初步分数，并且本周期总体分数可能较低。 AI
排序理由 关于会议学术论文审稿分数的讨论帖。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Curious about the initial review distribution for Main Track theory papers this year.</p> <p>Our paper received 4/3/3 with confidence 3/3/3. From previous years, I've had the impression that theory papers often receive more conservative initial s…