English(EN) I created an open-sourced test and composer 2.5 is off the chart

开源基准测试显示 composer 2.5 的表现优于 Grok 45

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-07-19 06:12

一位 Reddit 用户开发了一个开源基准测试来评估 AI 模型，特别关注它们在短上下文问题上的表现。结果表明，composer 2.5 的表现非常出色，超越了 Grok 45，并且展现出比最初预期的更强的能力。此外，该基准测试还表明，在此上下文中，K3 优于 Fable 和 Sol。 AI

影响为评估 AI 模型（尤其是在短上下文场景中）提供了一个新的基准，突出了 composer 2.5 的优势。

排序理由用户创建的基准测试和 AI 模型性能比较。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 用户创建的基准测试和 AI 模型性能比较。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: product, other; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 77 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/cursor TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/Dangerous-Rub-6338 · 2026-07-19 06:12

我创建了一个开源测试，composer 2.5 超出预期

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1v0inql/i_created_an_opensourced_test_and_composer_25_is/"> <img alt="I created an open-sourced test and composer 2.5 is off the chart" src="https://external-preview.redd.it/Ak0vieONMT0bKmDZzB6PFUUrv9ZSsgh4mbooDo0…