PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 02:27:49

NeurIPS Review Process Question: Score Updates After Discussion

A user on the r/MachineLearning subreddit is seeking information about the review process for the NeurIPS conference. They are specifically asking about the likelihood of reviewers updating their scores after indicating that their concerns have been resolved during the discussion phase. The user is also observing a lack of engagement from other reviewers on their submission. AI

RANK_REASON The item is a user question on Reddit about a conference's internal review process, lacking broader industry significance.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

NeurIPS Review Process Question: Score Updates After Discussion

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 Français(FR) · /u/Invariant_n_Cauchy ·

    Question about NeurIPS discussion phase [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>One reviewer said all concerns were resolved during discussion but hasn’t updated their score yet. The other reviewers haven’t engaged. In previous NeurIPS cycles, how common is it for reviewers to update scores after saying concerns are resolved…