PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 02:27:48

NeurIPS E&D track authors question response protocol for ethical reviews

A user on the r/MachineLearning subreddit is seeking clarification on the review process for papers submitted to the NeurIPS E&D track. Specifically, they are asking whether authors are expected to respond to ethical review comments during the official discussion period, similar to how they would respond to standard academic reviews. The user is looking for guidance on the correct procedure for submitting these responses, such as using the 'Official Comment' feature. AI

IMPACT Clarifies procedural aspects of AI research publication venues.

RANK_REASON User query about conference review process, not a direct announcement or event.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 1 sources. How we write summaries →

NeurIPS E&D track authors question response protocol for ethical reviews

COVERAGE [1]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Empty_Astronomer8376 ·

    NeurIPS E&D: Should authors respond to ethical reviews during the discussion period? [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>We submitted a paper to the NeurIPS E&amp;D track and received the official reviews. About a week later, we also received ethical review comments.</p> <p>My question is about the review process rather than the content of the reviews.</p> <p>Durin…