PulseAugur
EN
LIVE 03:28:03

NeurIPS faces technical issues impacting paper review process · 2 sources tracked

By PulseAugur Editorial · [2 sources] ·

The Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) is experiencing technical issues that are impacting the review process. In one instance, reviewers were unable to see the rebuttals submitted by authors, leading to a lack of engagement. This has prompted discussions on strategies to encourage reviewer participation and potential penalties for non-engagement, with suggestions that NeurIPS might penalize reviewers who do not engage with submitted papers. AI

IMPACT Potential delays and reduced quality in the peer-review process for AI research.

RANK_REASON Discussion of issues within the peer-review process of a major academic conference.

Read on r/MachineLearning →

AI-generated summary · Google Gemini · from 2 sources. How we write summaries →

NeurIPS faces technical issues impacting paper review process · 2 sources tracked

COVERAGE [2]

  1. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 (AF) · /u/grumpket ·

    NeurIPS reviewers not engaging [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>So I know this is an ongoing issue at ML conferences, reviewers just tend to ghost. Do people have any strategies or recommendations on how to nudge them to engage with the rebuttals? Is it recommended to post a comment saying something like hey …

  2. r/MachineLearning TIER_1 (AF) · /u/grumpket ·

    Neurips rebuttals not visible to reviewers [D]

    <!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>Hi everyone, </p> <p>The author-reviewer discussion period has started, but it looks like the rebuttals are still only visible to program chairs and authors only - so reviewers can't see them ?? I also can't see the rebuttals of papers I reviewed…

RELATED ENTITIES

RELATED TOPICS