PulseAugur
实时 16:32:45
English(EN) Do people process # ChatGPT recommendations lazily or reflectively? Three randomized experiments manipulated # AI output order, errors, and alleged reliability.

人们是懒惰地还是反思性地处理 # ChatGPT 推荐?三项随机实验操纵了 # AI 输出顺序、错误和声称的可靠性。

研究表明,用户倾向于表现出一种 AI

排序理由 [lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

人们是懒惰地还是反思性地处理 # ChatGPT 推荐?三项随机实验操纵了 # AI 输出顺序、错误和声称的可靠性。

报道来源 [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    Do people process # ChatGPT recommendations lazily or reflectively? Three randomized experiments manipulated # AI output order, errors, and alleged reliability.

    Do people process # ChatGPT recommendations lazily or reflectively? Three randomized experiments manipulated # AI output order, errors, and alleged reliability. Users showed a “first‑is‑best” # bias — less so when warned about the unreliability of # LLMs . https:// doi.org/10.101…