PulseAugur
实时 18:36:29
English(EN) @ carnage4life I worked in # infosec for a while. My experience was, absolutely no appetite for C-suite to spend on security until there is regulation. # regula

安全支出与监管挂钩,LLM 可靠性受辩论

一位安全专业人士指出,高管层在监管到位之前对投资安全几乎不感兴趣。该人士还评论了 LLM 的可靠性,认为即使不是最先进的,它们对于许多应用来说也足够可靠。 AI

影响 表明监管框架是安全投资的关键驱动因素,并且当前的 LLM 可靠性可能足以满足许多运营角色。

排序理由 该条目是社交媒体平台上用户关于安全支出和 LLM 可靠性的观点,而非主要来源公告。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

报道来源 [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    @ carnage4life I worked in # infosec for a while. My experience was, absolutely no appetite for C-suite to spend on security until there is regulation. # regula

    @ carnage4life I worked in # infosec for a while. My experience was, absolutely no appetite for C-suite to spend on security until there is regulation. # regulateAi or ideas like yours are dead in the water. LLMs are reliable enough. That recent German court case found Google Ai …