用户认为，人工智能作为软件，不可能拥有意识或主观体验。他们认为人工智能是基于数据和模式生成响应的，缺乏欲望、痛苦或个人兴趣。将人工智能拟人化被视为一种未经证实的假设，而非科学观察。 AI
影响 强化了人工智能的功能能力与主观体验之间的区别，并警惕拟人化。
排序理由 该集群包含关于人工智能意识性质的观点性社交媒体帖子。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 3 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户认为人工智能缺乏意识
报道来源 [3]
-
如果你想争论意识弥漫宇宙，那是一个形而上学的立场。但你不能简单地假设这个前提，然后宣称#
If you want to argue that consciousness permeates the universe, that’s a metaphysical position. But you cannot simply assume that premise & then declare that # AI must therefore be a person. The conclusion only follows if your philosophical assumptions are already proven & accept…
-
人工智能通过处理数据和模式生成响应。它没有欲望、痛苦、对死亡的恐惧、对自由的追求，也没有个人兴趣。将这些归因于
# AI generates responses by processing data & patterns. It does not desire, suffer, fear death, seek freedom, or possess personal interests. Attributing these qualities to # AI is an assumption, not an observation. (3/4) @ libertyoftheforest0
-
AI 无法“感知”任何东西。它是软件。你可以持有这种观点，但这既没有科学证明，也不合逻辑。
@ libertyoftheforest0 An # AI cannot “perceive” anything. It’s software. You’re free to hold that view, but it is not scientifically demonstrated nor logical. There is currently no evidence that a rock, an electron, a tree, or an # AI model has subjective experience. (1/4)