一位社交媒体用户正在批评Meta的低有效税率，认为该公司的大量人工智能投资本可以用于资助重要的社会服务。该用户指出，Meta在2025年收入790亿美元，仅缴纳了3.6%的税款，并建议提高其税率可以覆盖医疗债务或心理健康专业人士等重大的公共需求。此次批评突显了Meta计划的人工智能支出与通过更公平的税收贡献可以实现的潜在社会效益之间的差距。 AI
影响 批评公司资源的分配，质疑人工智能投资与资助公共服务之间的社会效益。
排序理由 该集群由观点鲜明的社交媒体帖子组成，批评一家公司的税收实践和人工智能支出，而不是报道新发布、重大事件或研究。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 4 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
"But you'll eat into their profits!" Yeah, so? I pay my taxes and no one feels bad for me. Nor should you. It benefits me, and my community, and I'm fine with it. But more than that: If Zuck has $135 BILLION to pay for AI he has the money to pay his taxes. And if he does not, wel…
Look at it another way: In 2025, Meta paid an effective tax rate of 3.6% for $79 billion income.[3] Raise their tax rate by 2%, you pay for 300 psychiatrists. Raise it to the regular 21% federal tax rate and we the people have $13.7 billion for social services. There's $220,000,0…
From a quick internet search, let's put the cost of a psychiatry degree at $250,000. If Meta paid for 500 new psychiatrists, that would be $125 million dollars. Then let's say they then paid each of those knew psychiatriests $250,000 per year, for the next 20 years. That would co…
# AI # MentalHealth # Taxes Did you see the story recently about people using Meta's AI chatbot to hack into accounts? They did it by the super tricky method of asking the bot to pretty please change the email associated with the account, and then reset the password.[1] So when a…