English(EN) How common are TMLR desk rejections with "not a suitable venue"? [D]

TMLR 稿件被拒引发研究人员对发表场所适宜性的疑问

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-06-10 22:56

一位 Reddit r/MachineLearning 版块的研究人员正在试图了解《机器学习与系统汇刊》（TMLR）期刊稿件被“退稿”（desk rejection）的普遍性及原因。该用户收到的拒稿理由是“不适合的发表场所”和“不符合我们的编辑标准”，他希望了解通常触发此类决定的因素，例如范围不符或证据不足，以便更好地定位未来的投稿。 AI

影响寻求发表场所的研究人员应了解期刊的投稿标准和常见的拒稿原因。

排序理由用户正在询问特定学术期刊稿件被“退稿”的普遍性和原因。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

r/MachineLearning

论文

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 用户正在询问特定学术期刊稿件被“退稿”的普遍性和原因。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 80 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/observer678 · 2026-06-10 22:56

“不适合的投稿地点”导致TMLR退稿有多常见？[D]

<div class="md"><p>Submitted a short theoretical paper to TMLR and got desk-rejected with "does not meet our editorial standards or allow us to assess claims and evidence" and "not a suitable venue for this work."</p> <p>Is this a common outcome…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

“不适合的投稿地点”导致TMLR退稿有多常见？[D]

相关实体

相关话题