English(EN) @ bkuhn I wonder, why they only count "by number of # token s"? And not by "tons of # carbonDioxide "? That would give employees the flexibility to use less #

Mastodon 用户质疑 AI 环境影响的 token 数量计算方式

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-06-10 13:56

一位 Mastodon 用户质疑了在衡量环境影响时只关注 token 数量的做法，建议使用二氧化碳排放量作为更直接的指标。该用户提出，计算二氧化碳排放量将为开发人员提供更大的灵活性来管理其 AI 模型对环境的影响。这意味着当前的衡量标准可能无法完全捕捉 AI 开发和部署的生态成本。 AI

排序理由这是一条社交媒体帖子，没有提供新信息或可验证的说法，属于“梗”类别。

在 Mastodon — sigmoid.social 阅读 →

其他

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

报道来源 [1]

Mastodon — sigmoid.social TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] · 2026-06-10 13:56

@ bkuhn I wonder, why they only count "by number of # token s"? And not by "tons of # carbonDioxide "? That would give employees the flexibility to use less #

@ bkuhn I wonder, why they only count "by number of # token s"? And not by "tons of # carbonDioxide "? That would give employees the flexibility to use less # AI , if they go to work by # car instead of # bicycle or accept # paySlip s in # crypto .

链接 fedi.copyleft.org/@bkuhn

报道来源 [1]

@ bkuhn I wonder, why they only count "by number of # token ﻿s"? And not by "tons of # carbonDioxide "? That would give employees the flexibility to use less #

相关实体

相关话题

@ bkuhn I wonder, why they only count "by number of # token s"? And not by "tons of # carbonDioxide "? That would give employees the flexibility to use less #