一位 Mastodon 用户对一个开源应用程序优先支持 OOXML 而非 ODT 表示难以置信，并质疑 xAI 和 Google AI 参与此类项目。用户的评论暗示了对资源分配不当或对关键文档格式缺乏关注的看法。 AI
排序理由 用户对开源应用程序的感知问题发表评论。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
开源应用因偏重 OOXML 而非 ODT 受批评
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户对开源应用程序的感知问题发表评论。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 115 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
令人难以置信的是，一个开源应用程序竟然专注于 OOXML，而对 ODT 的支持却只是部分。而且 xAI 和 Google AI？拜托……让我们开始吧
@ itsfoss It's unbelievable that an open source application focuses on OOXML and has only partial support for ODT. Moreover xAI an Google AI? Come on... Let's support openness and privacy, not proprietary formats and surveillance AIs, please! # ai # onlyoffice # odf # ooxml # pro…