用户对苹果的隐私声明表示怀疑，并引用其在中国的行为以及集成政府强制的后门作为公司宣传的证据。他们认为，真正的隐私只能通过完全离线的设备端解决方案来实现，并将其与将成本外部化的AI技术进行对比。用户还提到了Mistral通过隔离式自托管在工业客户中取得的成功，尽管他们将此与基本的机器学习和机器视觉应用区分开来。 AI
影响 用户认为真正的隐私需要离线、设备端的解决方案，并将其与当前的AI趋势进行对比。
排序理由 用户观点文章，讨论隐私和AI技术。
在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 3 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
@ alcatholic @ eduo @ Linux @ nileane @ wbs_legal @ EUCommission if Apple was actually "pro privacy" they'd only do on-device & self-hosting instead of partnering with Google Gemini for "Apple Intelligence" … Which they ain't & don't! Again: Stop huffing' corporate propaganda and…
@ alcatholic @ eduo @ Linux @ nileane @ noybeu @ wbs_legal @ EUCommission If you can't trust the users, then why should you trust Apple, who are known to collude against the interests of said users? Like in the "PR" China where they served all their customers on a silver platter …
@ alcatholic @ Linux @ nileane @ EUCommission the only ones that can provide any resemblance of privacy are those that run 100% on ine's personal device & offline! Not that it makes them any less Wasteful Computing , but at least it forces those fanboying AI slop to actually pay …