English(EN) what user context would you actually pass into an OpenAI app?

AI 开发者就应用用户上下文展开辩论，权衡实用性与隐私

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [2 个来源] · 2026-06-06 21:12

开发者正在就向 AI 应用提供用户上下文的适当数量进行辩论，在实用性与隐私问题之间取得平衡。核心挑战在于使 AI 应用有用，同时又不至于过于通用或侵入性。一种提议的解决方案是提供一个经用户同意的上下文 API，允许用户批准与 AI 工具共享特定数据，例如写作风格或过去的互动。 AI

影响开发者正在寻求将用户数据集成到 AI 应用中的最佳实践，以增强功能性，同时尊重隐私。

排序理由 Reddit 上关于 AI 应用设计和用户隐私的讨论，并非直接的产品发布或研究发现。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; Reddit 上关于 AI 应用设计和用户隐私的讨论，并非直接的产品发布或研究发现。
Source corroboration: 2 independent sources; Multiple independent publishers reporting the same story raises confidence that it's real and newsworthy.
Topics: product, safety; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 90 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/OpenAI TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/joyal_ken_vor · 2026-06-08 23:12

什么情况下你会允许 OpenAI 应用向你请求上下文信息？

<div class="md"><p>i'm trying to figure out what user context actually belongs inside AI apps.</p> <p>not the creepy “track everything” version. more like: writing style, preferred tools, current projects, interests, maybe a limited summary from chatgpt history if …
r/OpenAI TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/joyal_ken_vor · 2026-06-06 21:12

你会将哪些用户上下文实际传递给 OpenAI 应用？

<div class="md"><p>i keep getting stuck on this when building AI app flows.</p> <p>the model gets way more useful if it knows the user a little, but passing in too much context feels like a privacy problem waiting to happen.</p> <p>i tried normal onboarding questio…