在纽约上诉法院，法官们严厉斥责了一名律师在上诉听证会上引用了至少三起虚构案件，并在另外十起案件中歪曲了法律。律师 Michael Sanders 难以解释这些捏造引用的来源，促使法官们对法律论证的诚信表示失望和担忧。尽管没有明确提及生成式人工智能，但此事件凸显了律师使用会产生虚假法律引用的 AI 工具的日益增长的趋势，这可能导致处罚和司法沮丧。 AI
影响 凸显了人工智能生成内容在法律环境中的风险，可能导致更严格的司法监督和人工智能使用的道德准则。
排序理由 该集群讨论了一名律师使用虚假引用的具体案例，很可能是由于人工智能造成的，以及法官的反应，这反映了人工智能在法律实践中的影响，而不是一项新政策或产品发布。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 3 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
“It's striking, concerning, disappointing, and saddening to think that members of the bar would forward cases to a court that don't exist, and to think that the lawyers on the other side of that didn’t read it for whatever reason, didn’t check it.”
Watch These Judges Rip Into Lawyers For Citing Cases That Don't Exist https:// fed.brid.gy/r/https://www.404m edia.co/new-york-court-ai-citations-landberg-case/
<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1tzl0nj/watch_these_judges_rip_into_lawyers_for_citing/"> <img alt="Watch These Judges Rip Into Lawyers For Citing Cases That Don't Exist" src="https://external-preview.redd.it/7BEmltbQQVenyvWaSKgZnboKyLbGAiNvA3Qt…