English(EN) gemma-4-12b-it vs Qwen3.5-9B on shared benchmarks: Qwen is overall winner beating gemma in 5/8 benchmarks despite a smaller footprint

Qwen3.5-9B 在基准测试中优于 Gemma-4-12B-it

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-06-03 19:51

对 Gemma-4-12B-it 和 Qwen3.5-9B 大型语言模型的比较表明，Qwen 在每千兆字节的性能上通常优于 Gemma。尽管 Qwen 模型的参数量较小，但在 8 项基准测试中的 5 项取得了更好的结果。虽然 Gemma-4-12B-it 在编码能力方面可能略有优势，但 Qwen 也有针对此类任务的专门微调版本。 AI

影响 Qwen3.5-9B 展现出与更大模型相媲美的性能，可能影响在高效本地部署方面的选择。

排序理由对两个开源模型在基准测试上的比较。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]

在 r/LocalLLaMA 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 对两个开源模型在基准测试上的比较。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=1.0]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: model release, paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 121 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/LocalLLaMA TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/fulgencio_batista · 2026-06-03 19:51

gemma-4-12b-it 对比 Qwen3.5-9B 共享基准测试：Qwen 总体获胜，尽管模型更小但击败 gemma 赢得 5/8 项基准测试

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1tw0lua/gemma412bit_vs_qwen359b_on_shared_benchmarks_qwen/"> <img alt="gemma-4-12b-it vs Qwen3.5-9B on shared benchmarks: Qwen is overall winner beating gemma in 5/8 benchmarks despite a smaller footprint" src…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

gemma-4-12b-it 对比 Qwen3.5-9B 共享基准测试：Qwen 总体获胜，尽管模型更小但击败 gemma 赢得 5/8 项基准测试

相关实体

相关话题