一项发表在arXiv上的新研究以经济学为案例，调查了影响研究论文在著名期刊上发表的因素。研究人员开发了一个基于大型语言模型的评估器，可以直接从文本评估论文质量，独立于作者的人脉关系。研究结果表明，虽然执行质量至关重要，但想法质量和作者人脉也起着重要作用，其中人脉关系具有轻微优势，尤其是在期刊选择性最高的顶尖期刊中。 AI
影响 提供了一种评估研究质量的新颖方法，可能影响学术出版标准以及人工智能在科学评估中的作用。
排序理由 分析研究发表因素的学术论文，使用了大型语言模型。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 3 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
arXiv:2606.03763v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Does scientific publishing reward the quality of ideas or the advantage of connections? The question is universal to prestige-driven science, yet it has resisted decades of study because a paper's quality could not be gauged ahead…
Does scientific publishing reward the quality of ideas or the advantage of connections? The question is universal to prestige-driven science, yet it has resisted decades of study because a paper's quality could not be gauged ahead of its publication fate without using that fate a…
Does scientific publishing reward the quality of ideas or the advantage of connections? The question is universal to prestige-driven science, yet it has resisted decades of study because a paper's quality could not be gauged ahead of its publication fate without using that fate a…