一位用户正在咨询，在主会议评审完成之前将论文投稿至研讨会是否会影响其机会。他们担心在任何一个会议上被录用或拒绝的后果，尤其因为他们不是主会议投稿的主要作者。用户还提到该研讨会是一个女性活动，并且已经提交了摘要。 AI
排序理由 用户关于学术出版政策的咨询。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户询问在主会议论文评审前是否可以投稿至研讨会
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户关于学术出版政策的咨询。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- paper, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Standard
- On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
- Story freshness
- 102 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
主会议论文工作坊投稿正在评审中 [D]
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>I have an ECCV paper main conf. Can I submit the same to a workshop at some other place happening before ECCV? The other workshop (non archival) will be after the final decisions of eccv come. Under any result in eccv- acceptance or rejection, ho…