English(EN) I compared AI costs across 22 models — here's what surprised me

AI 模型成本差异巨大：不同提供商之间存在 40 倍的差价

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-05-29 07:47

一位开发者分析了 8 家提供商的 22 个 AI 模型在特定提示下的成本，揭示了显著的价格差异。分析发现，客户支持分类任务的成本差异高达 40 倍，并指出 GPT-4o mini 已不再是最便宜的选择，其价格被 DeepSeek V3 和 Gemini 1.5 Flash 等模型超越。研究还指出，对于简单任务而言，高级推理模型可能过于昂贵，在一次 JSON 提取任务中，成本差异高达 890 倍。 AI

排序理由面向开发者的 AI 模型成本和性能分析。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.7]

在 dev.to — LLM tag 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 面向开发者的 AI 模型成本和性能分析。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.7]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: infra, product; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: 132 days old; Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

dev.to — LLM tag TIER_1 English(EN) · Darul · 2026-05-29 07:47

我比较了22款AI模型的成本——结果令我惊讶

I was building an AI feature into a side project when I realised I had no idea what I was actually spending. I knew the ballpark. GPT-4o is "expensive". Haiku is "cheap". But I didn't know the numbers for my specific prompts — and the gap between "expensive" an…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

我比较了22款AI模型的成本——结果令我惊讶

相关实体

相关话题