English(EN) Is Composer 2.5 better than Glm 5.1 and DeepSeek v4 pro in real world tasks?

Cursor 用户担心转向按使用量计费的 AI 定价

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [2 个来源] · 2026-05-24 16:47

AI 驱动的代码编辑器 Cursor 的用户对可能的价格模型变更表示担忧。一些用户担心 Cursor 可能会采用类似 Codex 和 Claude 等其他 AI 工具的按使用量计费模式。这将改变他们目前按月订阅的模式，后者被认为对重度用户来说更可预测且更具成本效益。 AI

影响 AI 编码工具潜在的定价变化可能会影响开发者的成本和采用率。

排序理由用户讨论产品定价模型及其潜在变化。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 2 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

报道来源 [2]

r/cursor TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/x1xspiderx1x · 2026-05-24 22:43

I’m worried that cursor is going to follow the others on pricing.

<div class="md"><p>Im on month 4 of cursor and I absolutely love it. I pay $60 a month an usually hold out for large plans until my API renews (large decisions are expensive). I’ve noticed codex,Claude, and seems like everyone else has moved to a shitty hour max BS…
r/cursor TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/LittleYouth4954 · 2026-05-24 16:47

Is Composer 2.5 better than Glm 5.1 and DeepSeek v4 pro in real world tasks?

<div class="md"><p>I am new to Cursor and still testing the free version. Benchmark for Composer 2.5 indicates it is better than DeepSeek v4 and Glm 5.1. What are your experiences? I also use Claude and Codex, but they are inconsistent and expensive. </p> </div><!-…