作者表示有兴趣资助人工智能测谎技术的发展。他们设想了一个系统，让个人拥有与信用评分并列的“伪证评分”，旨在消除辨别谁在撒谎的需要。这被置于对美国当前法律体系的批评之中，作者声称由于企业对“零事实核查”的要求，该体系忽视了伪证。 AI
排序理由 该条目是社交媒体帖子中的个人观点/愿望清单，而不是关于具体发展或事件的报道。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
作者建议人工智能测谎技术可提供个人伪证评级
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该条目是社交媒体帖子中的个人观点/愿望清单，而不是关于具体发展或事件的报道。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- 137 days old
- Aged out of breaking-news scoring windows; ranking reflects the durable signal from the full source set.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
这就是为什么我对资助任何开发#人工智能谎言检测的人感兴趣，这样我们每个人都将拥有个人#伪证评级以及信用评级，并且不会有
This is why I'm interested in funding anyone developing # AI lie detection so we all have a personal # perjury rating as well as a credit rating and don't have to think about who is lying anymore. We don't prosecute # perjury in the # UnitedStates because the corporate overlords …