用户在质疑，由在海量数据集上训练的模型生成的AI代码是否可能包含“待办事项”（TODO）注释。这是基于“TODO”标记在用于训练的代码库中普遍存在的假设。 AI
排序理由 该条目是一篇社交媒体帖子，提出了一个猜测性的问题，没有新的事实信息或分析。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
AI代码可能因训练数据包含“TODO”注释
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该条目是一篇社交媒体帖子，提出了一个猜测性的问题，没有新的事实信息或分析。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我在想，肯定有那么多训练数据包含TODO，AI代码里肯定到处都是它？
I was thinking, surely so much of the training data has TODO in it, surely # AI code should be full of it?