PulseAugur
中
实时 06:45:29
English(EN) Before you submit your MCP server to Claude's Connectors Directory: a checklist from Anthropic's own review criteria

Anthropic 详细说明 Claude Connectors Directory 提交清单

Anthropic 发布了开发者提交服务器到其 Connectors Directory 的详细清单,强调安全和正确的工具注解。指南要求开发者将读写操作分离为不同的工具,为每个工具提供清晰的标题和描述,并确保错误消息具有信息量而非通用性。此外,提交内容必须包含关键组件,如 HTTPS URL、适用的 OAuth 2.0、公共文档、隐私政策和支持联系方式。 AI

影响 开发者现在可以更好地为他们的集成准备提交到 Anthropic 的 Claude Connectors Directory,从而提高可用工具的质量和安全性。

排序理由 关于提交到特定产品目录的指南。

在 dev.to — MCP tag 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

Anthropic 详细说明 Claude Connectors Directory 提交清单

本文如何被排名

Signal score
25 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Tool
关于提交到特定产品目录的指南。
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
product, safety
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
Breaking (< 6h)
Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

  1. dev.to — MCP tag TIER_1 English(EN) · sms-florin ·

    在向 Claude 连接器目录提交您的 MCP 服务器之前:来自 Anthropic 自身审查标准的清单

    <p>I have two MCP servers waiting in the Connectors Directory review queue right now, so I went through Anthropic's published criteria line by line and turned them into a checklist. Everything below comes from the official docs (links at the end). I do not know the inside of the …