作者表达了强烈抵触使用AI的态度，理由是其被认为无效、有害，并且与创作过程存在根本冲突。尽管曾近距离接触过将AI整合到项目中的认真尝试，但作者发现这项技术与其预期目的格格不入，认为即使AI的输出表面上看起来符合预期，也破坏了这些结果的意义。 AI
排序理由 该条目是社交媒体平台上的个人观点文章，没有更广泛的行业影响或新闻价值。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
作者批评AI有害且无效
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该条目是社交媒体平台上的个人观点文章，没有更广泛的行业影响或新闻价值。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
我不用AI，因为它很糟糕、有害、不好用，而且我在创作时脑子里没有“提示词”——但我曾近乎认真地尝试去使用它
I don't use AI because it sucks, harms, doesn't work & I don't have a "prompt" in my head when creating - but I've been close to earnest attempts at taking it seriously in two different projects & they have a 100% "The tech is fundamentally in conflict with the purpose" ratio. No…