PulseAugur
中
实时 16:56:09
English(EN) oct 28 i posted that nobody outside openai had confirmed its "ETH is false" proof update: ETH's 1998 co-proposer calls it "very shocking news" openai's and anth

OpenAI的以太坊证伪震惊联合提案者,专家质疑其复杂性

OpenAI近期声称已证伪一项1998年的以太坊提案,此消息引起了巨大震动,其中一位联合提案者称其为“非常令人震惊的消息”。据报道,该证明已通过OpenAI和Anthropic的检查,但专家们对此表示怀疑,认为其计算复杂度仅次于约10^2,389个变量以上的暴力破解方法。 AI

影响 引发了关于复杂AI生成证明在专业领域实际应用和验证的疑问。

排序理由 该条目讨论了OpenAI的一项声明及其反响,而非官方发布或产品公告。

在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

OpenAI的以太坊证伪震惊联合提案者,专家质疑其复杂性

本文如何被排名

Signal score
1 / 100
Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket
Commentary
该条目讨论了OpenAI的一项声明及其反响,而非官方发布或产品公告。
Source corroboration
Single-source cluster
Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics
paper, other
Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance
High
Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness
Breaking (< 6h)
Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

  1. Mastodon — mastodon.social TIER_1 English(EN) · mohith808 ·

    10月28日我发帖称,除了OpenAI之外,没有人证实其“ETH是假的”的证明更新:ETH的1998年联合提案者称这是“非常令人震惊的消息”,OpenAI和Anth

    oct 28 i posted that nobody outside openai had confirmed its "ETH is false" proof update: ETH's 1998 co-proposer calls it "very shocking news" openai's and anthropic's proofs both pass a lean check. 3 experts reviewing it only beats brute force past ~10^2,389 variables lol https:…