早期用户对谷歌的 Gemini AI 模型分享了褒贬不一的评价。Ethan Mollick 称赞 Gemini 4 Carbon 比 Argon 有所改进，并且其思维方式与 Claude 和 GPT 不同，特别强调了它能够用 3JS 复制视频片段的能力。相比之下，其他用户则表示沮丧，称 Gemini 是“最差的 AI 代理”，并批评其设计和性能，认为谷歌的大量资源并未转化为有效的 AI 能力。 AI
影响 Gemini 的用户反馈不一，凸显了尽管投入巨资，AI 代理的设计和性能仍面临持续挑战。
排序理由 多位用户正在讨论和批评谷歌 Gemini AI 模型的性能和设计。
在 Bluesky Jetstream — AI desk 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 4 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
Had early access to Gemini 4 Carbon, it is a very good model that improves on Argon. It is useful to have an AI that thinks differently than Claude/GPT & is still highly capable, but has its own strengths & weakness One fun demo: I gave Carbon a video clip & it reproduced it in …
Why is Gemini the worst AI agent out there? Google has mounds of money and still can't get it right. Before anyone hops on the high horse about how they all suck, I use some agents and I don't care. Gemini is the worst at doing anything I ask it for. Just my couple of cents for t…
Also a more efficient system would not use verbal tokens but some more efficient representation. I am convinced some representation evolved from Iris Number System could do the job. It would have to be derived by an iterative process and I have no idea what it would be. We would …
I have Gemini agreeing with me it is a bad design but we are stuck with it. But this is because I have this Gemini trained as best I can. I use AGENTS.md to constrain it to try to reject assumptions Google ‘AI’ tries to insert. A GOOD design would apply Maximum Entropy principles…