English(EN) ICLR27: Reviewer says my paper is too close to the same paper that I previously had in a workshop. [D]

研究人员面临ICLR论文相似性审查挑战

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-11-06 15:09

一位研究人员在国际学习表示会议（ICLR）上面临两难境地，因为一位审稿人指出他提交的论文与之前在研讨会上发表的版本过于相似。研究人员承认方法和标题的更改可能模糊了两者之间的联系，但他认为这本质上是同一项改进后的工作。尽管初步评分不佳，研究人员仍寻求建议，如何在不违反匿名规则的情况下解决审稿人对论文新颖性的担忧。 AI

排序理由这是Reddit上用户生成的帖子，讨论了研究论文同行评审过程中的个人经历，而不是关于新进展的公告或分析。

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

International Conference on Learning Representations

论文

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 1 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 这是Reddit上用户生成的帖子，讨论了研究论文同行评审过程中的个人经历，而不是关于新进展的公告或分析。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/fanconic · 2026-11-06 15:09

ICLR27: Reviewer says my paper is too close to the same paper that I previously had in a workshop. [D]

<div class="md"><p>I submitted my paper to ICLR, after improving and correcting since I "published" it previously in a workshop/arXiv. In this process, I changed the name of the method and title.</p> <p>Now a reviewer, pointed out that my method is very c…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

ICLR27: Reviewer says my paper is too close to the same paper that I previously had in a workshop. [D]

相关实体

相关话题