English(EN) I stopped writing big architecture docs for Cursor. I only add a rule when it already messed up.

Cursor IDE 用户转向最小化规则文件以控制 AI 代理行为

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-11-06 11:25

一位软件开发者改变了在 Cursor IDE 中管理 AI 代理行为的方法。他们不再维护很快就会过时的详尽架构文档，而是使用一个简洁的规则文件。该文件仅在 AI 代理出现重大错误时更新，并添加新规则以防止特定错误再次发生，例如不完整的代码修改或重新发明已删除的功能。 AI

影响这种方法可能通过关注实际的失败而非理论文档，为指导软件开发中的 AI 代理提供一种更有效的方式。

排序理由用户生成的内容，讨论现有软件产品中的特定功能或工作流程。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 3 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 用户生成的内容，讨论现有软件产品中的特定功能或工作流程。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: product, other; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/cursor TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/LateQuantity4194 · 2026-11-06 11:25

I stopped writing big architecture docs for Cursor. I only add a rule when it already messed up.

<div class="md"><p>I used to keep a long <a href="http://ARCHITECTURE.md">ARCHITECTURE.md</a> for the agent. It went stale, and the agent kept confidently following old patterns. Now I keep a short rules file, and every time it screws up in a way I'll care about ag…