一位Reddit用户正在询问旧的OpenAI模型在Cursor IDE中被停用的可能性。用户对OpenAI和Cursor之间所谓的“分手”表示失望，并感叹失去多样化的视角，同时质疑是否会集成新模型或移除现有模型。他们还寻求有关自定义端点等潜在变通方法的信息，以维持对所需模型的访问。 AI
影响 可能影响用户在开发工具中访问特定AI模型。
排序理由 用户讨论产品集成和模型可用性。
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
Cursor用户在“分手”后质疑OpenAI模型可用性
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 5 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Tool
- 用户讨论产品集成和模型可用性。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- product, other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
那些旧的OpenAI模型会保留还是也会消失？
<!-- SC_OFF --><div class="md"><p>This whole split with OpenAI is disappointing, I rather enjoyed having adversarial reviews and just a different perspective, could use Sol for one side and Opus for another.</p> <p>Do we have specifics on what the divorce will do? No newer models…