English(EN) AA is getting ridiculous now. Zero open weights in the Most Attractive Quadrant.

Reddit用户批评AI分析指数排除开源模型

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-28 10:19

Reddit上r/LocalLLaMA板块的一位用户对Artificial Analysis (AA)模型排名系统（特别是5.0版本）表示不满。用户指出，最新版本似乎将其“最有吸引力象限”中的所有开源模型排除在外，这与之前版本承认DeepSeek、GLM、Kimi和Qwen等模型的做法大相径庭。这种排除让用户质疑该指数的有效性，并考虑转而依赖附属基准测试。 AI

影响引发了对AI模型排名系统的透明度和方法论的质疑。

排序理由用户对AI基准/排名系统的评论。

在 r/LocalLLaMA 阅读 →

其他

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户对AI基准/排名系统的评论。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: other; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Same-day; Cluster formed today. Ranking reflects the current source set at time of score.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/LocalLLaMA TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Realistic_Gap_5871 · 2026-10-28 10:19

AA现在太离谱了。在最具吸引力象限中零开放权重。

<table> <tr><td> <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1xhk7hp/aa_is_getting_ridiculous_now_zero_open_weights_in/"> <img alt="AA is getting ridiculous now. Zero open weights in the Most Attractive Quadrant." src="https://preview.redd.it/dvq3y314o6yh1.png?width=140…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

AA现在太离谱了。在最具吸引力象限中零开放权重。

相关实体

相关话题