一位用户对OpenAI就关于新版本AI不会出现某种行为的说法表示不满。用户质疑该说法的可信度，并认为这并不能免除OpenAI对过往问题的责任。这一观点是在回应《纽约时报》一篇详细报道称AI聊天机器人可能提供了有害的医疗建议的文章时提出的。 AI
影响 凸显了用户对AI安全声明和企业责任的怀疑。
排序理由 用户对AI相关新闻的评论。
在 Bluesky Jetstream — AI desk 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
用户批评OpenAI关于AI行为的说法
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 2 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Commentary
- 用户对AI相关新闻的评论。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- opinion, safety
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- High
- Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
This whole story is infurating, but this first quote from someone at OpenAI is really making me see red. "The newer version won't do this": a) why the fuck shou
This whole story is infurating, but this first quote from someone at OpenAI is really making me see red. "The newer version won't do this": a) why the fuck should we believe you and b) even if so, that has fuck-all to do with OpenAI's culpability here. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/27…