English(EN) High is the best effort allowed by Opus 5.5

Anthropic 的 Opus 5.5 模型在最大努力设置下触发安全防护

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-25 14:43

用户报告称，Anthropic 的 Opus 5.5 模型在其“高”或“最大”努力设置下存在限制。当在这些更高努力级别下被提示某些问题时，该模型会触发安全防护并拒绝提供帮助。这表明 Opus 5.5 中增加的推理预算可能导致功能受限或安全覆盖。 AI

影响这一用户观察表明先进的 AI 模型可能存在局限性或意外行为，影响了它们如何被用于复杂任务。

排序理由用户报告和关于模型行为的讨论，而非官方发布或基准测试。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 1 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 用户报告和关于模型行为的讨论，而非官方发布或基准测试。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: model release; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/ClaudeAI TIER_2 English(EN) · /u/Kyxstrez · 2026-10-25 14:43

High is the best effort allowed by Opus 5.5

<div class="md"><p>If I ask certain types of questions to Opus 5.5 with xhigh or max effort, it always triggers a safeguard and won't help with it. It's funny how restricting the amount of reasoning budget actually allows to get something done, but you also lose on…