English(EN) The audacity to mess with *existing* project folders is crazy

Anthropic 用户因强制推出的“Threads”功能取代文件夹而反抗

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-25 02:24

用户对Anthropic近期对其平台进行的更改表示强烈不满，特别是将现有的聊天文件夹转换为新的“Threads”功能。许多用户认为这项更改是在未经他们同意的情况下强加的，破坏了他们既定的组织系统和工作流程。据报道，新功能缺乏以前文件夹系统的功能，例如正确编辑消息或分支聊天，导致对话的组织和控制能力下降。 AI

影响用户的不满凸显了用户控制和定制在人工智能产品开发中的重要性。

排序理由用户对产品更改的抱怨，而非正式公告或重大行业事件。

在 r/Anthropic 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Meme; 用户对产品更改的抱怨，而非正式公告或重大行业事件。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: product, other; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/Anthropic TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Deep-Tea9216 · 2026-10-25 02:24

敢于随意更改*现有*项目文件夹的做法太疯狂了

<div class="md">Yes I'm mad, sorry I didn't want my project folders to become threads, genuinely fuck Anthropic for this. Add new features sure but don't change my existing ones, I'm sick of them So many of my chats are now "threads", I d…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

敢于随意更改*现有*项目文件夹的做法太疯狂了

相关实体

相关话题

敢于随意更改现有项目文件夹的做法太疯狂了