English(EN) How does arXiv prepublishing work with ICLR's double-blind review? [R]

arXiv预发布挑战ICLR双盲评审流程

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-23 11:51

一位博士生在Reddit上提出了一个担忧，关于在arXiv上预发布研究成果如何可能与ICLR等会议使用的双盲评审流程相冲突。该学生指出，通过搜索引擎很容易找到预发布论文，这可能会损害双盲评审所需的匿名性，并导致论文被直接拒绝。这种做法给研究人员在平衡优先权声明的愿望与公平评审的需求之间带来了两难。 AI

排序理由该集群讨论了学术研究出版中有关预发布和同行评审的程序性问题。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]

在 r/MachineLearning 阅读 →

论文

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 0 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Tool; 该集群讨论了学术研究出版中有关预发布和同行评审的程序性问题。[lever_c_demoted from research: ic=1 ai=0.4]
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: Standard; On-topic for AI-industry coverage; kept in the public index.
Story freshness: 1 days old; Coverage has settled into its steady-state source set.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

报道来源 [1]

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/richapeee · 2026-10-23 11:51

How does arXiv prepublishing work with ICLR's double-blind review? [R]

<div class="md">Hey folks, maybe a really dumb question from an inexperienced PhD student. I recently submitted to ICLR and spotted a bunch of papers that I was already familiar with because I had seen them on arXiv before. Doesn't this break the d…

本文如何被排名

报道来源 [1]

How does arXiv prepublishing work with ICLR's double-blind review? [R]

相关实体

相关话题