PulseAugur
实时 18:24:19
English(EN) Why call it agentic when that definition doesn’t match the original meaning at all? I think it’s a dogwhistle for the Epstein class, for the ‘new world order’ a

人工智能的“agentic”一词被批评为“新世界秩序”的暗语

人工智能中的“agentic”一词因其重新定义偏离了原始含义而受到批评。批评者认为,这种新的用法充当了威权主义的“新世界秩序”阶层及其投资者的暗语。该论点认为,该术语故意误导,掩盖了工作场所和民主被颠覆以强加控制和服从的真正目的。 AI

排序理由 该条目是一篇社交媒体帖子,表达了关于人工智能中“agentic”一词的边缘阴谋论,缺乏可信来源或更广泛的行业相关性。

在 Mastodon — fosstodon.org 阅读 →

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →

人工智能的“agentic”一词被批评为“新世界秩序”的暗语

报道来源 [1]

  1. Mastodon — fosstodon.org TIER_1 English(EN) · [email protected] ·

    Why call it agentic when that definition doesn’t match the original meaning at all? I think it’s a dogwhistle for the Epstein class, for the ‘new world order’ a

    Why call it agentic when that definition doesn’t match the original meaning at all? I think it’s a dogwhistle for the Epstein class, for the ‘new world order’ authoritarian power class & investors. I think it reveals exactly what it is designed for & in PR pretends to a utility i…