English(EN) Conference papers are cooked! [D]

AI会议论文质量引发审稿人不满

作者 PulseAugur 编辑部 · [1 个来源] · 2026-10-18 22:12

一位在国际学习表征会议（ICLR）和AAMAS的审稿人对提交论文的低质量表示沮丧。该审稿人指出，许多投稿论文尚未达到在重要会议上发表的标准，并敦促作者，特别是初次投稿者，在投稿前寻求指导和反馈，以避免浪费审稿人的时间。 AI

影响凸显了AI研究同行评审过程中可能存在的问题，影响了高质量研究成果的传播。

排序理由关于学术论文投稿现状的评论。

AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。我们如何撰写摘要 →

本文如何被排名

Signal score: 3 / 100; Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
Newsworthiness bucket: Commentary; 关于学术论文投稿现状的评论。
Source corroboration: Single-source cluster; Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
Topics: paper; Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
AI-industry relevance: High; Clearly on-topic for AI-industry coverage.
Story freshness: Breaking (< 6h); Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.

完整方法见我们的编辑标准。

r/MachineLearning TIER_1 English(EN) · /u/Fantastic-Nerve-4056 · 2026-10-18 22:12

会议论文被炮制！[D]

<div class="md">Got three papers to review for ICLR and five for AAMAS, and believe me the quality of these papers is insanely bad. I would even refrain from accepting them to a workshop, let alone be main venues. A sincere request; Please don't …