英国数学家查尔斯·巴贝奇回忆了两次被议会成员问及他的分析机输出的经历。提问者想知道，如果输入的数据不正确，机器是否仍能产生正确的结果。巴贝奇表示无法理解导致这种疑问的困惑之处。 AI
排序理由 该条目是社交媒体上分享的历史轶事，并非当前的人工智能事件或发展。
在 Mastodon — mastodon.social 阅读 →
AI 生成摘要 · Google Gemini · 来自 1 个来源。 我们如何撰写摘要 →
查尔斯·巴贝奇因分析机逻辑问题受到议会质询
本文如何被排名
- Signal score
- 0 / 100
- Composite score across the factors below. Higher = stronger signal that this story matters right now.
- Newsworthiness bucket
- Meme
- 该条目是社交媒体上分享的历史轶事，并非当前的人工智能事件或发展。
- Source corroboration
- Single-source cluster
- Only one publisher covered this so far. Single-source stories can still rank when the publisher is high-authority, but they lack cross-source corroboration.
- Topics
- other
- Editorial topic classification. Feeds into how the story surfaces on /topic/<slug> hub pages and into the per-entity coverage mix.
- AI-industry relevance
- Low
- Off-topic or adjacent — cluster remains reachable but doesn't surface in AI-industry rankings.
- Story freshness
- Breaking (< 6h)
- Fresh story with cross-source coverage still developing. Ranking may shift as more sources report.
完整方法见我们的编辑标准。
报道来源 [1]
-
有两次，议员们问我：“先生，如果您在机器里输入错误的数字，会得到正确的答案吗？”
"On two occasions I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." Charles Babbage …